Reaffirming my forecast.

The question is stated as delivery of a "S-300 or S-400 missile system." A "system" requires all the major operational components to be delivered (search radar, targeting radar, missile launcher, command post, etc.). Regarding hiding the system, while I agree that generally you don't want to give away the exact location of your military assets, it is important to credibly signal your enemies if you expect to deter them. Most of the Iranian comments to this point are probably inward directed, to create a sense of strength in the aftermath of the nuclear deal with the West. Outward directed statements (to Israel) will come when the system is actually functioning.

Files
Khalid
made a comment:

@000, my MOOC completion rate is 18/24 = 75% though a lot of those were "soft" subjects. If learning Python feels too much like "work" I'll drop out. Alternatively, I'll have to cut down on GJOpen (I'll probably do so anyway once a bunch of questions close over the New Year).

Files
Inactive-102
made a comment:

@Khalid, I'm in same state. I have MOOCs on numerical methods, terrorisme (in French) , bioinformatics and game theory coming up. Keeping busy on these will distract me from my lousy Brier score. Of course if the 4 questions getting scored on Monday tick my score back down below 1, I will probably remain addicted.

Actually I thought terrorismes was on-demand but it looks like I've missed the entire session! Will have to re-enroll

https://www.france-universite-numerique-mooc.fr/courses/CNAM/01019/session01/about

There's a START terrorism course on Coursera I think I'm enrolled in which is upcoming. It's not a subject that hooks me that much, being rather ill-defined. I started another Dutch terrorism course on Coursera a while ago which was on-demand but I didn't like the format. If you know French, the lecturer in the above course was more engaging.

Files
Inactive-102
made a comment:

@Khalid, I'm looking at the course archive for Terrorismes, luckily I should be able to watch the videos. The annoying ambiguity of the topic is illustrated by the following exchange between a student and the professor for the course:

Q : Guerre d'Algérie : vous parlez du terrorisme des algériens mais vous oubliez les massacres commis par les français !
R : CE SUJET RESTE SENSIBLE ET DOULOUREUX ET DANS UNE GUERRE (ON DIT ENCORE LES "EVENEMENTS" OFFICIELLEMENT), IL Y A HELAS BEAUCOUP D'EXACTIONS DE TOUTES PARTS.

Files
Inactive-136
made a comment:

Awesome discussion, very interesting links.

For the record, I believe the question should be voided, but if not, well, the game's the game.

Happy New Year, everyone!

Files
Anneinak
made a comment:

@Khalid, I'm so disappointed to hear that you intend to cut back your participation in GJI. I will miss your contributions!

Files
Khalid
made a comment:

@Anneinak, thank you. I very much doubt I'll really cut back! However, in the last four months I've probably spent more time on this project than any equivalent period in the GJP and that's hard to sustain.

Files
Inactive-102
made a comment:

@Khalid, interesting you're more hooked on this year because I found last year more intense.

Files
Heffalump
made a comment:

@000 @khalid: Lars was in the market format, last year, but Khalid, I don't remember bumping into you. I agree, Lars, the market format is more compelling. The only thing that is keeping me interested, this year, is messing with the scraping and the game-within-a-game. I am definitely not doing hard research like I did or reading nonstop to keep up on topics.

Files
Heffalump
made a comment:

Remember a couple of months ago when I threw down "I'm bored"? I'm still bored.

Files
Inactive-102
made a comment:

@Heffalump, yeah I'm super bored with this. It's filling out the same 88-question survey over and over every day for no reason. No gift card, no spooks, no drama because the interaction format doesn't support flame wars.

Files
Files
Tip: Mention someone by typing @username