SCOTUSblog asks

In Carpenter v. United States, will the Supreme Court rule that investigators' warrantless use of Timothy Carpenter's cellphone records was unconstitutional?

Started Nov 03, 2017 05:00PM UTC
Closed Jun 22, 2018 05:00PM UTC
Tags

In 2016, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruled that prosecutors legally used historical cellular phone location records obtained without a warrant to convict two men, Timothy Carpenter and Timothy Sanders, of armed robbery. Those men contend that the seizure of those records without a warrant was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its current term, but if it does not, the question will resolve as no. Confused? Check our FAQ or ask us for help.
The Supreme Court did rule that investigators' warrantless use of Timothy Carpenter's cellphone records was unconstitutional. This question closed as "yes" with an end date of 22 June 2018 (The Supreme Court of the United States). See our FAQ to learn about how we resolve questions and how scores are calculated.
Possible Answer Correct? Final Crowd Forecast
Yes 65.00%
No 35.00%

Crowd Forecast Profile

Participation Level
Number of Forecasters 350
Average for questions older than 6 months: 206
Number of Forecasts 535
Average for questions older than 6 months: 586
Accuracy
Participants in this question vs. all forecasters average

Most Accurate

Relative Brier Score

1.
-0.258
2.
-0.258
3.
-0.253
4.
-0.252
5.
-0.248

Recent Consensus, Probability Over Time

Files
Tip: Mention someone by typing @username