SCOTUSblog asks
In Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, will the Supreme Court rule that Ohio's supplemental process for voter registration list-maintenance is legal?
Started
Nov 03, 2017 05:00PM UTC
Closed Jun 11, 2018 05:00PM UTC
Closed Jun 11, 2018 05:00PM UTC
Challenges
In 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruled that the state of Ohio's supplemental process for purging the names of inactive voters from its rolls was illegal because it violated the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Help America Vote Act of 2002. The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its current term, but if it does not, the question will resolve as no. Rulings about the content of confirmation notices will not affect the resolution of the question.
Confused? Check our FAQ or ask us for help.
The Supreme Court ruled that Ohio’s supplemental process for voter registration list-maintenance is legal. This question closed as "Yes" with an end date of 11 June 2018. See our FAQ to learn about how we resolve questions and how scores are calculated.
The Supreme Court ruled that Ohio’s supplemental process for voter registration list-maintenance is legal. This question closed as "Yes" with an end date of 11 June 2018. See our FAQ to learn about how we resolve questions and how scores are calculated.
Possible Answer | Correct? | Final Crowd Forecast |
---|---|---|
Yes | 65.00% | |
No | 35.00% |
Crowd Forecast Profile
Participation Level | |
---|---|
Number of Forecasters | 276 |
Average for questions older than 6 months: 206 | |
Number of Forecasts | 435 |
Average for questions older than 6 months: 586 |
Accuracy | |
---|---|
Participants in this question vs. all forecasters | worse than average |