SCOTUSblog asks
In Dalmazzi v. United States, will the Supreme Court rule that Judge Martin Mitchell was disqualified to rule on Nicole Dalmazzi's appeal before the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals?
Started
Jan 16, 2018 05:00PM UTC
Closed Jun 22, 2018 05:00PM UTC
Closed Jun 22, 2018 05:00PM UTC
Challenges
In 2016, the US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces dismissed (SCOTUS Blog) Nicole DalmazziÍs objections to Judge Martin Mitchell serving as an appellate military judge on the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCA) while also serving as a military judge on the United States Court of Military Commission Review (USCMCR). Dalmazzi claimed that Judge MitchellÍs appointment to the USCMCR disqualified him to serve as an appellate judge on the AFCCA due to the statutory ban on dual-officeholding by civil servants (SCOTUS Blog, SCOTUS Blog). Dalmazzi also claims that simultaneous service on both the AFCCA and the USCMCR violates the Appointments Clause of the US constitution. The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its current term, but if it does not, the question will resolve as no.
Confused? Check our FAQ or ask us for help.
This question closed as "no" with an end date of 22 June 2018 (The Supreme Court of the United States). See our FAQ to learn about how we resolve questions and how scores are calculated.
This question closed as "no" with an end date of 22 June 2018 (The Supreme Court of the United States). See our FAQ to learn about how we resolve questions and how scores are calculated.
Possible Answer | Correct? | Final Crowd Forecast |
---|---|---|
Yes | 50.00% | |
No | 50.00% |
Crowd Forecast Profile
Participation Level | |
---|---|
Number of Forecasters | 114 |
Average for questions older than 6 months: 206 | |
Number of Forecasts | 201 |
Average for questions older than 6 months: 586 |
Accuracy | |
---|---|
Participants in this question vs. all forecasters | average |