But no I don't see them disclosing an actual attack, too sensitive, unless tattle-tale on someone else or boasting by the attacker.

Files
Drew
made a comment:

Yea there has to be an occurrence of the event that's not hushed up. That adds another hurdle to yes. However, anything significant will break through into the media.

Files
GL2814
made a comment:

Another mal-formed question. By the literal definition a ransomware attack would count or some number or machines compromised for a botnet attack somewhere else are just a few that come to mind and don't go to the intent of the question.

Files
Inactive-102
made a comment:

"Anything significant will break through into the media." ... Like the S-300 delivery, @GJDrew?

Seriously we need classes on how to use the telephone and Twitter and not go to Google Press Release for all of our information.

Or you can hook us up with some hidden cameras and binoculars.

Files
Drew
made a comment:

If you have hidden cameras in all these places 000, you're way overqualified for GJ Open :) We can only rely on open source info.

Files
Inactive-102
made a comment:

@GJDrew, how about putting CHAMPS KNOW and some tutorial on source analysis into the Training section? Or is it necessary for the Control Group to be completely reliant on atavistic sentience? Also some list of open source alternatives and modelling techniques in preference to Googling press releases.

Files
GL2814
made a comment:

@000 Heavens to Betsy we can't have the unwashed masses embarrassing the Super Dupers* can we? Avengers assemble @cmeinel, @ravel, @redacted, @morrell, @Anneinak, @Heffalump. Please include any others that I may have overlooked.

* this trademark open

Files
53
made a comment:

Wait a sec, @GL2814. I don't think I've duped anyone.

Files
Drew
made a comment:

We're working on more training materials. Should have some new stuff up soon. As for Super Dupers -- no one is a Super Duper unless they can prove it in competition.

Files
Inactive-43
made a comment:

CHAMPS KNOW: the gateway to Super Duperdom:

Comparison classes. Provide relevant classes and calculate base rates.
Hunt for info. Share the evidence that helps inform your prediction.
Adjust. Explain the reason for updating your prediction.
Models. Explain any application of mathematical or statistical models.
Post-mortem. Interpret past failures and successes; draw implications for the future.
Select effort. Describe the optimal level of effort.
Know the power-players. Describe individuals with influence and how will they use it.
Norms & protocols. Describe laws, rules, scheduled meetings, etc., that matter.
Other perspectives. Describe bottom-up processes (protest, culture, market forces, technology, etc.) that may play a role.
Wildcards. Explain the sources and magnitude of uncertainty.

Files
username-deleted 688
made a comment:

CHIMPS THROW - the atavistic sentient approach to darts for Super Dudes and Dudettes -

C - Complain. Curiosity helps but complainers win arguments.
H - Hang out with other CHIMPS.
I - Imagine being invisible so you can go anywhere and peek at the answer.
M - Make stuff up.
P - Pretend to know what you are talking about.
S - Spend more time chatting than researching or predicting.

T - Talk like a 'spook' to impress the tribe.
H - Have obscure links to establish street cred.
R - Reveal discreetly that you have secret back channel connections, true or not.
O - Omit logic, evidence, basic reasoning skills.
W - Whine. This is the most important CHIMP skill and sign of true Super Dudes. Getting a question voided through whining is advanced skill set.

You can test whether you have mastered these CHIMPS THROW techniques by looking at your Challenge board placement. Any category with >600 position is proof you are top limb CHIMPS!
Good luck and Best wishes!

Files
Files
Tip: Mention someone by typing @username