In Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, will the Supreme Court rule that the Manhattan Neighborhood Network is a public forum for First Amendment purposes?
Started
Jan 11, 2019 06:00PM UTC
Closed Jun 17, 2019 05:00PM UTC
Closed Jun 17, 2019 05:00PM UTC
Challenges
Tags
A suit over First Amendment rights violations was dismissed by the district court, concluding that First Amendment protections do not apply to Manhattan Neighborhood Network because it is not a public forum and its employees are not state actors (Reuters, Oyez, SCOTUSBlog). The appeals court reversed in part, ruling that public access TV channels in Manhattan are public forums and the case should proceed (SCOTUSBlog). The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its current term, but if it does not, the question will resolve as no.
Confused? Check our FAQ or ask us for help.
The question closed "No" with a closing date of 17 June 2019 (SCOTUS).
See our FAQ to learn about how we resolve questions and how scores are calculated.
Possible Answer | Correct? | Final Crowd Forecast |
---|---|---|
Yes | 60.00% | |
No | 40.00% |
Crowd Forecast Profile
Participation Level | |
---|---|
Number of Forecasters | 80 |
Average for questions older than 6 months: 206 | |
Number of Forecasts | 142 |
Average for questions older than 6 months: 586 |
Accuracy | |
---|---|
Participants in this question vs. all forecasters | worse than average |