The Monkey Cage & SCOTUSblog ask
In Gill v. Whitford, will the Supreme Court rule that any part of Wisconsin's redistricting plan is an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander?
Started
Sep 01, 2017 05:00PM UTC
Closed Jun 20, 2018 05:00PM UTC
Closed Jun 20, 2018 05:00PM UTC
Challenges
Tags
In November 2016, the District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin ruled 2-1 that the state legislature's redistricting plan was unconstitutional (Reuters, NBC News, SCOTUS Blog). The Supreme Court agreed in July 2017 to hear an appeal (NY Times). Oral arguments are currently scheduled to be heard on 3 October 2017.
Confused? Check our FAQ or ask us for help.
In Gill v. Whitford, the Supreme Court did not rule that any part of Wisconsin’s redistricting plan was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. This question closed as "b) No" with an end date of 18 June. See our FAQ to learn about how we resolve questions and how scores are calculated.
In Gill v. Whitford, the Supreme Court did not rule that any part of Wisconsin’s redistricting plan was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. This question closed as "b) No" with an end date of 18 June. See our FAQ to learn about how we resolve questions and how scores are calculated.
Possible Answer | Correct? | Final Crowd Forecast |
---|---|---|
Yes | 65.00% | |
No | 35.00% |
Crowd Forecast Profile
Participation Level | |
---|---|
Number of Forecasters | 1241 |
Average for questions older than 6 months: 207 | |
Number of Forecasts | 1836 |
Average for questions older than 6 months: 587 |
Accuracy | |
---|---|
Participants in this question vs. all forecasters | average |