Started Mar 14, 2018 05:00PM UTC   •   Closed Jun 26, 2018 05:00PM UTC (5 months ago)

SCOTUSblog asks

In National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, will the Supreme Court rule that any state-licensed healthcare providers were improperly denied an injunction over California's Reproductive FACT Act?

In 2016, the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) challenged the constitutionality of California's FACT Act's requirement that licensed healthcare providers post notices about the availability of state abortion programs, asking for a preliminary injunction of the law. That injunction was denied; a decision which was upheld by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Oyez) (SCOTUSblog). NIFLA is challenging this ruling in the Supreme Court (SCOTUS Blog) (Roll Call). The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its current term, but if it does not, the question will resolve as no.

Confused? Check our FAQ or ask us for help.


This question closed as "Yes" with an end date of 26 June 2018 (The Supreme Court of the United States).

See our FAQ to learn about how we resolve questions and how scores are calculated

Tags
Challenges
Answer was correct

Most Accurate

Accuracy Score

1.
-0.184
2.
-0.154
3.
-0.128
4.
-0.128
5.
-0.126