SCOTUSblog asks

In National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, will the Supreme Court rule that any state-licensed healthcare providers were improperly denied an injunction over California's Reproductive FACT Act?

Started Mar 14, 2018 05:00PM UTC
Closed Jun 26, 2018 05:00PM UTC
Tags
Society   Health  

In 2016, the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) challenged the constitutionality of California's FACT Act's requirement that licensed healthcare providers post notices about the availability of state abortion programs, asking for a preliminary injunction of the law. That injunction was denied; a decision which was upheld by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Oyez) (SCOTUSblog). NIFLA is challenging this ruling in the Supreme Court (SCOTUS Blog) (Roll Call). The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its current term, but if it does not, the question will resolve as no. Confused? Check our FAQ or ask us for help.
This question closed as "Yes" with an end date of 26 June 2018 (The Supreme Court of the United States). See our FAQ to learn about how we resolve questions and how scores are calculated
Possible Answer Correct? Final Crowd Forecast
Yes 65.00%
No 35.00%

Crowd Forecast Profile

Participation Level
Number of Forecasters 68
Average for questions older than 6 months: 208
Number of Forecasts 128
Average for questions older than 6 months: 589
Accuracy
Participants in this question vs. all forecasters average

Most Accurate

Relative Brier Score

1.
-0.184
2.
-0.154
3.
-0.128
4.
-0.128
5.
-0.126

Recent Consensus, Probability Over Time

Files
Tip: Mention someone by typing @username