The Economist asks:

In US v. Hemani, will the Supreme Court rule that the federal prohibition against unlawful users or addicts of any controlled substance from possessing firearms violates the Second Amendment as applied to Hemani?

Started Nov 07, 2025 06:00PM UTC
Closing Jul 01, 2026 07:01AM UTC

Ali Danial Hemani was indicted by a federal grand jury in February 2023 under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), which prohibits "an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance" from possessing firearms (Supreme Court - US v. Hemani, see page 5A, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3)). The district court and Fifth Circuit found for Hemani on his "as applied" challenge, and the US appealed to the Supreme Court (Mandelbaum Barrett PC, Duke Center for Firearms Law, Gun Owners of America, SCOTUSblog). The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its 2025 term, but if it does not, the question will close as "No." If the Court decides this case without addressing this question's particular issue or issues of law, the question will close as "No." A decision that the statute in question facially violates the Second Amendment will count.

Confused? Check our FAQ or ask us for help. To learn more about Good Judgment and Superforecasting, click here.

To learn more about how you can become a Superforecaster, see hereFor other posts from our Insights blog, click here.

Possible Answer Crowd Forecast Change in last 24 hours Change in last week
Yes 35.00% -1.00% -4.90%
No 65.00% +1.00% +4.90%

Sign up or sign in to forecast!

Sign Up Sign In
Files
Tip: Mention someone by typing @username