Started Nov 03, 2017 05:00PM UTC   •   Closing Jul 16, 2018 06:59AM UTC

SCOTUSblog asks

In Carpenter v. United States, will the Supreme Court rule that investigators' warrantless use of Timothy Carpenter's cellphone records was unconstitutional?

In 2016, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruled that prosecutors legally used historical cellular phone location records obtained without a warrant to convict two men, Timothy Carpenter and Timothy Sanders, of armed robbery. Those men contend that the seizure of those records without a warrant was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its current term, but if it does not, the question will resolve as no.

Confused? Check our FAQ or ask us for help.

Name Probability
Yes 62%

Sign up or sign in to forecast!

Sign Up Sign In