Started Nov 03, 2017 05:00PM UTC   •   Closed Jun 11, 2018 05:00PM UTC (1 year ago)

SCOTUSblog asks

In Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, will the Supreme Court rule that Ohio's supplemental process for voter registration list-maintenance is legal?

In 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruled that the state of Ohio's supplemental process for purging the names of inactive voters from its rolls was illegal because it violated the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Help America Vote Act of 2002. The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its current term, but if it does not, the question will resolve as no. Rulings about the content of confirmation notices will not affect the resolution of the question.

Confused? Check our FAQ or ask us for help.

The Supreme Court ruled that Ohio’s supplemental process for voter registration list-maintenance is legal. This question closed as "Yes" with an end date of 11 June 2018.

See our FAQ to learn about how we resolve questions and how scores are calculated.

Answer was correct

Most Accurate

Accuracy Score