SCOTUSblog asks

In Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, will the Supreme Court rule that Ohio's supplemental process for voter registration list-maintenance is legal?

Started Nov 03, 2017 05:00PM UTC
Closed Jun 11, 2018 05:00PM UTC
Tags

In 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruled that the state of Ohio's supplemental process for purging the names of inactive voters from its rolls was illegal because it violated the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Help America Vote Act of 2002. The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its current term, but if it does not, the question will resolve as no. Rulings about the content of confirmation notices will not affect the resolution of the question. Confused? Check our FAQ or ask us for help.
The Supreme Court ruled that Ohio’s supplemental process for voter registration list-maintenance is legal. This question closed as "Yes" with an end date of 11 June 2018. See our FAQ to learn about how we resolve questions and how scores are calculated.
Possible Answer Correct? Final Crowd Forecast
Yes 65.00%
No 35.00%

Crowd Forecast Profile

Participation Level
Number of Forecasters 276
Average for questions older than 6 months: 207
Number of Forecasts 435
Average for questions older than 6 months: 587
Accuracy
Participants in this question vs. all forecasters worse than average

Most Accurate

Relative Brier Score

1.
-0.896
2.
-0.894
4.
-0.851
5.
-0.81

Recent Consensus, Probability Over Time

Files
Tip: Mention someone by typing @username