SCOTUSblog asks
In Murphy v. NCAA, will the Supreme Court rule that Congress cannot prohibit New Jersey from amending or repealing its existing prohibitions on sports gambling?
Started
Dec 08, 2017 06:00PM UTC
Closed May 14, 2018 06:59AM UTC
Closed May 14, 2018 06:59AM UTC
Challenges
By a count of 7-2, the question closed with "Yes" with an end date of 14 May.
(SCOTUS)
In 2016, the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) prohibited the state of New Jersey from repealing certain laws regarding sports gambling (The Chicago Tribune). New Jersey appealed that decision to the Supreme Court, arguing that Congress does not have the authority to prohibit amendment or repeal of those laws (SCOTUSBlog, The Washington Post). The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its current term, but if it does not, the question will resolve as no.
Confused? Check our FAQ or ask us for help.
Question clarification
Issued on 04/05/18 03:50pm
Due to the change in New Jersey governors, Phil Murphy's name was substituted for Chris Christie's name in the case at bar. Therefore, the case name has been revised to "Murphy v. NCAA".
Due to the change in New Jersey governors, Phil Murphy's name was substituted for Chris Christie's name in the case at bar. Therefore, the case name has been revised to "Murphy v. NCAA".
Resolution Notes
By a count of 7-2, the question closed with "Yes" with an end date of 14 May.
(SCOTUS)
Possible Answer | Correct? | Final Crowd Forecast |
---|---|---|
Yes | 75.00% | |
No | 25.00% |
Crowd Forecast Profile
Participation Level | |
---|---|
Number of Forecasters | 230 |
Average for questions older than 6 months: 209 | |
Number of Forecasts | 300 |
Average for questions older than 6 months: 592 |
Accuracy | |
---|---|
Participants in this question vs. all forecasters | average |