In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, will the Supreme Court rule that Marlean Ames must show "background circumstances to support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority" in her employment claims of discrimination based on sexual orientation and sex?
Closed Jun 05, 2025 02:00PM UTC
Ames sued her employer, the Ohio Department of Youth Services, after being demoted and fired from her job, claiming she was discriminated against because she is a heterosexual (Ogletree Deakins, JD Supra). The district court granted summary judgment for the department and the Sixth Circuit affirmed, stating that, under circuit precedent, Ames failed to show "background circumstances" that would justify a claim made by a member of a majority class (Sixth Circuit - Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, SCOTUSblog). The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its 2024 term, but if it does not, the question will close as "No." If the Court decides this case without addressing this question's particular issue of law, the question will close as "No."
Confused? Check our FAQ or ask us for help. To learn more about Good Judgment and Superforecasting, click here.
To learn more about how you can become a Superforecaster, see here. For other posts from our Insights blog, click here.
The question closed "No" with a closing date of 5 June 2025.
See our FAQ to learn about how we resolve questions and how scores are calculated.
Possible Answer | Correct? | Final Crowd Forecast |
---|---|---|
Yes | 12% | |
No | 89% |
Crowd Forecast Profile
Participation Level | |
---|---|
Number of Forecasters | 25 |
Average for questions older than 6 months: 170 | |
Number of Forecasts | 70 |
Average for questions older than 6 months: 500 |
Accuracy | |
---|---|
Participants in this question vs. all forecasters | average |