In Louisiana v. Callais and/or Robinson v. Callais, will the Supreme Court rule that Louisiana's congressional district map creating two majority-Black congressional districts (aka "S.B. 8 map") is illegal and/or unconstitutional?
Closed Jun 27, 2025 02:30PM UTC
After various rounds of judicial and legislative proceedings, the Louisiana state legislature adopted Senate Bill 8 (S.B. 8), which created two congressional districts where Black residents were a majority of the population (NBC News, NPR, Louisiana State Legislature - S.B. 8). A group of Louisiana voters, including Phillip Callais, sued the state, asserting that race had unconstitutionally predominated in the drawing of one of the congressional districts (AP, Callais v. Landry - Complaint 31 January 2024). The district court agreed with the voters, ruling that S.B 8 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution and thus prohibiting Louisiana from using that map in the future, and the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case (Callais v. Landry - Injunction 30 April 2024, SCOTUSblog - Louisiana v. Callais, NBC News). The Supreme Court consolidated Louisiana v. Callais and Robinson v. Callais for consideration, the latter being different litigation over the same issue. The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its 2024 term, but if it does not, the question will close as "No." If the Court decides these cases without addressing this question's particular issue of law, the question will close as "No."
Confused? Check our FAQ or ask us for help. To learn more about Good Judgment and Superforecasting, click here.
To learn more about how you can become a Superforecaster, see here. For other posts from our Insights blog, click here.
The question closed "No" with a closing date of 27 June 2025.
See our FAQ to learn about how we resolve questions and how scores are calculated.
| Possible Answer | Correct? | Final Crowd Forecast |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 42% | |
| No | 58% |
Crowd Forecast Profile
| Participation Level | |
|---|---|
| Number of Forecasters | 23 |
| Average for questions older than 6 months: 160 | |
| Number of Forecasts | 66 |
| Average for questions older than 6 months: 474 | |
| Accuracy | |
|---|---|
| Participants in this question vs. all forecasters | average |